Info

The moves 16.if3 and I6. xb5 fail to lead to an advantage (as well). An example with 16.fxe5 is Kuindzhi-Tseitlin, Soviet Union 1971 16 Stf8 17. b3 Sd8 18.exf6 < Bf4+ I9.*bl Hxdl+ 20.Bxdl Wxf6 21.0xb5 axb5, and now 22. xb5i c6 23.Hfl d6 24.1,xc6+ xc6 25. b8+ *d7 26.1 ,a7+ & e8 27. b8+ would have led to perpetual check and a draw. 16 ixd5 17.nxd5 tc5 After I7 b6 White also holds the draw 18.Axh5+ (I8.ikd3 and 18.Bd3 do not convince) I8 axh5 I9.tg8+.& f8 20. e6+, Capelan-Polugaevsky,...

SI

Belgrade 1996 1.e4 c5 2. f3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4. xd4 5.f c3 b6 This plan, with the small transposition 4 ' b6 5.< Sc3 was thought up in the '60s by the Swedish opening guru Rolf Martens and baptised G& Pa. It was only when he mentioned it in the introduction to a remarkable article in the Swedisch magazine SSKK-Bulletinen 1988 1 and subsequently devoted a series of articles to it in Schacknytt, that the idea acquired a following. 6,e5 lc5 7.J.e3 This is an automatic response. In the rapid game...

Hah

This is refuted. 17.gS7 is less good as well, as Black can react strongly with 17 b4 , e.g. 18Ab5 (bad is 18.gxf67bxc3 19.1xc3 Bxc3 20.fxe7 Bxb2+ ) 18 Wa4 19.gxf6 bxa3 20.b3 (20.b4 J.a2+ ) 20 J.xb3 , with good chances for Black. With l7.< Sd5 could still have pulled the emergency break after 17 txd2 18.Exd2 he still has a quite playable position. 17 lxf6 18. d5b4 White had intended 18 Wxd2 19Axifi+ exf6 20.Bxd2, of course, and he is positional-ly winning. But the text gives Black a lightning...